Richard Baum

Liberal Democrat Councillor for St Marys ward - Bury MBC

Referendum shows many are unhappy with Council

Last week’s rejection of an elected Mayor for Bury is welcome. The proposals were a waste of money, democratically damaging, and I am glad that local people did not fall for the lies and spin on the issue of congestion charging.

However, the fact is that 10,000 people and 40% of those who voted indicated their desire to change the way Bury is run. I don’t think we should ignore their dissatisfaction with local services, nor their indictment of the way the Council is run. They voted for a Mayor despite the compelling reasons not to. I bet that many of those who voted “no” did so not out of love for the Council but because they took heed of the consequences of a “yes.”

Council services in Bury have been consistently cut over more than two decades of control by Labour, and more recently in the past couple of years by the Conservatives. Over that same period, Council Tax bills (and Community Charge and Rates before them) have gone up as we have been asked time and again to pay more for less. Every year the story is the same, and I bet I can write my budget speech for next year this weekend and barely have to change it on the night. It’s predictable even now that bills will go up and services will go down.

More disturbingly still, the power of local communities to have a fair say on local services continues to diminish. Post Offices have closed in Bury, as have maternity services and libraries, all in the face of significant public protest. The government and Council may pretend to “consult,” but their consultations are in fact information campaigns. I am as insulted by their lack of honesty about this as I am about the fact that they don’t listen to local views at all.

The Labour government, both nationally and locally, started this rot, and the Conservative administration in Bury since 2007 have done nothing to stop it.

Liberal Democrats in Bury have consistently supported local people in their attempts to stop the appalling cuts in local services. We led the successful fight to stop the closure of local secondary schools in 2005, and have also led appeals to save hospital facilities locally. Just last month a Liberal Democrat motion ensured Council support for an end to local Post Office closures, and our petition on the same topic has thousands of signatures. We are also the party who secured Council opposition to congestion charging.

Our respect for true devolution of power to communities can be seen in how we run the Prestwich Local Area Partnership – with real consultation with local people, and a variety of community groups having a legitimate say in how local money is spent. I recently took the chair of the Developing Communities Working Group, which has developed since its inception to be a leading forum for the community to have their say on the future of Prestwich.

The preservation of local services and obtaining value for money as well is no pipe-dream. It can be achieved through fairer local taxation, which is something that Lib Dems have proposed for a long time in the abolition of Council Tax and the reform of business rates.

The Mayoral referendum was not the right way to seek reform of our Council. But what it did achieve was showing those in charge that they are disappointing a great number in our communities. The failings of successive Labour and Conservative policies locally are clear, and there is lots that we need to do to improve. Local Liberal Democrats will continue their hard work for local people across Bury in the hope that we can create better local services that provide real value for the people of Bury.

Rick

2 Comments

  • On 07.16.08 Alan HInds wrote:

    See below.

    There seems to be a split in the Lib dems with Prestwich Lib dems and crumpsall lib dems having completely opposite policies in the same way they said different things about the heaton park car park a couple of years ago.

    Does this mean that Lib dems can say different things to different people even if you only live a mile apart? Surely that means you less of a Party and more a franchise brand where policies can swapped for local expediency.

    Manchester Liberal Democrats are supporting a bid for Government money to improve public transport but want to see a Greater Manchester-wide referendum to decide whether congestion charging is introduced. Manchester Liberal Democrat Leader Simon Ashley said: “It is only right that we see what money is on the table from Government for transport improvements, so Manchester Lib Dems support the funding bid being submitted.

  • On 07.16.08 richardbaum wrote:

    Hi Alan,

    I think the congestion charge debate isn’t about political parties, it’s about Boroughs. That’s why Crumpsall Lib Dems (in Manchester) have different views on it to Prestwich Lib Dems (in Bury). It’s also why Bury Labour and Rochdale Labour have completely different views to each other on it. It’s because each Borough gets different things out of the TIF bid. Certain Boroughs (like Manchester and Rochdale) get loads, and certain Boroughs (like Bury and Trafford) don’t.

    I don’t think it does anyone any favours trying to make a party political issue out of it, which is why I never mention the Labour split except when comparing it to our own. All parties are split on this. I don’t deny that we are, but I was elected by the people of bury, and I stand up for them ahead of anything else.

    I respect all views on the subject, but mine and our’s as a group is strongly against the charge. However, we’ll support the people if there is a Manchester-wide referendum and they’re for it.

    As for the quote you use - I agree with it entirely. We should have submitted the bid, and we did. And Bury Council supported the decision to do so. Now we have seen what money is on the table from government, and it’s not enough Rather than fund the £3bn they say we need, they are only funding half of it, and letting us pay for the rest through an unfair congestion charge. What I argue is that they should fund the lot. The ID card scheme costs £7.5bn. Scrap it, pay for all the MAnchester transport improvements, and you’ve still got £6bn left!

    Rick

have your say

Add your comment

:

: